Tuesday, October 8, 2024
Home Blog Page 1352

Oscars: Academy Announces First 11 Presenters-Performers, Including Lady Gaga and The Weeknd

0

The Academy has just announced the first 11 presenters of a long list scheduled for the February 28th show.

Since I know you’re wondering, 4 of the 11 are black. It’s all good. Kevin Hart, Whoopi Goldberg, The Weeknd, and Pharrell Williamn. The rest are Tina Fey, Ryan Gosling, Lady Gaga, Sam Smith, Charlize Theron, and 8 year old Jacob Tremblay.

Gaga, Weeknd, and Pharrell are likely performers. So is Smith.

Chris Rock hosts. Reginald Hudlin and David Hill are producers. No word yet on who is coming out dressed as The Bear from “The Revenant.”

More to come…

Rihanna Drops New Album for Free, As Shill for Jay Z’s Streaming Service

0

Rihanna’s new album, “Anti,” was leaked last night, pulled back, then released again. For free. Or not for free, since it involves a link back to Jay Z’s Tidal streaming service. Once there, you’re asked to sign up for a Tidal subscription.

It’s not worth it. “Anti” is not that great, so this convoluted marketing plan was invented to attract interest. The first single, “Work,” is awful but it’s gone to number 1 on iTunes. I don’t know why anyone’s still paying for it since it’s now “free” on Tidal.

Rihanna has some kind of investment in Tidal, so there’s a pay off for her somewhere in here. The “Anti” release is also supposed to be free for Samsung mobile users. (I’ve exhausted my interest in trying to get the thing onto my phone.)

Going this route excludes “Anti” from going up against Adele and Justin Bieber on the album charts. It’s on purpose. “Anti” is just not thought out properly, and not very exciting. As I wrote yesterday, I don’t know why Rihanna can’t find a good production team. And some guidance. Meanwhile, Jay Z will be the beneficiary of whatever happens here. Score.

Bruce Springsteen’s Amazing NY Show Draws Everyone from “Sopranos” Creator to Elliot “Client 9” Spitzer

0

What can I say? Bruce Springsteen is 66 years old going on 67. He’s obviously made a pact with the devil. His three hour show with the famous E Street Band last night at Madison Square Garden was a total joy, an exercise in the fury and glory of rock and roll, unadorned, with no gimmickry and lots of Chuck Berry inspired riffs.

It was a total joy, as Springsteen et al played the whole 1980 album “The River,” which is full of little gems you’ve forgotten if you ever knew them– like “Fade Away” and “I Wanna Marry You” and “Crush on You” and “The Price You Pay.” They were lost but now they’ve been found, in addition to “Hungry Heart” and “Out in the Street,” and “Sherry Darling,” the album’s centerpieces.

But the real joy is the set that comes after “The River,” which last night included “Dancing in the Dark,” “Rosalita,” “Thunder Road,” “Born to Run,” and a cover of “Shout” that ended the show. They are the Bruce classics, and the band played them with the same freshness as if they were new. This is band full of commitment, like maybe it’s their last chance. Why? They’re all rich. Why bother? And yet, it’s a miracle. These men and women (Patti Scialfa, Soozie Tyrell) are devoted to their work. “Dancing in the Dark” is 30 years old, but it soars, with Bruce and Patti each pulling dance partners (a la Courteney Cox) from the audience (until Bruce finally kicked Patti’s guy off– enough).

This show had been postponed from Sunday because of the blizzard. The group hadn’t played since the 19th– eight days– and plus, this is New York, hometown. The audience was very eclectic — from “Sopranos” creator David Chase to actress Jill Hennessy to Constantine Maroulis from “American Idol” to former New York Governor Elliot Spitzer aka Client 9. Also, the Garden was at its absolute fullest. Want to see what “sold out” looks like? Every seat in every box up to the roof was filled. Plus, the floor was almost all standing, and they stood, Bruce’s fans, like asparagus stalks. There was no blocked view seating. It was really theater in the round.

And it is theater. Three hours, a bunch of senior citizens don’t sit down, don’t go to the bathroom, take a break. They rock their little hearts out. There are mistakes. Three times Bruce tried to start “I Wanna Marry You,” and had to stop– either he or the band “f—ed up” and he laughed, and they finally got it. They don’t have backing track or backup singers filling in, or AutoTune. It’s just raw, real, genuine. After seeing younger acts recently, I fear it’s the end of an era, too. In 20 years, Bruce Springsteen and the E Street Band will seem quaint.

Shout outs to Steve van Zandt, more and more adding on vocals and sizzling guitar, and Nils Lofgren, who spins around on the stage while slicing chords. Jake Clemons honors his late uncle Clarence, with delicious horn re-enactments. Roy Bittan, Gary Tallent and Max Weinberg remain the heart of this insanely well oiled machine. PS Some nice duets with Bruce and Patti, and a little PDA at the end. Patti is the secret weapon of E Street, the MVP.

Michael Jackson to Be Played by White Actor, Joseph Fiennes, in TV Movie About Something that Never Happened

0

Let’s call it a fantasy. After his two 30th anniversary concerts in September 2011, Michael Jackson was stuck on the East Coast because of the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center. So he a) got in a car with Elizabeth Taylor and Marlon Brando and drove cross country to Los Angeles or b) stayed in New York for a while and eventually took a private plane home?

The real answer is b. But some British TV filmmakers want to believe a). So they’re going to make a half hour “road trip movie” starring Stockard Channing as Taylor, Brian Cox as Brando, and Joseph Fiennes, as Jackson.

Yes, Joseph Fiennes is white. He’s the brother of Ralph Fiennes, and known mostly for playing Shakespeare in “Shakespeare in Love” in 1998.

Bad idea? Yeah, horrid. Maybe it will be like “Melvin and Howard,” an imagined film about Howard Hughes and a road mechanic. But I doubt it. And in this moment of talk about race, the idea of a white actor playing Michael Jackson is not very appealing.

Plus, of course, the incident never happened. It’s all made up.

There will be no Michael Jackson music, of course. His Estate won’t allow it. But otherwise, they will be able to depict three dead celebrities in as ghastly a situation as they want. I’m just sorry they didn’t cast Cedric the Entertainer as Brando and Caitlyn Jenner as Taylor. But wait, maybe that’s a possibility.

Pop: Rihanna’s Not Great New Single Goes Straight to #1, Adele’s “Hello” Says Goodbye to Top 5

0

It’s the changing of the guard on the iTunes pop chart, but it may not be such a good thing.

Rihanna has finally released a single from what is going to be her “Anti” album. The single, “Work,” featuring Drake, is Anti. It’s anti- good. Anti- melody. Anti-lyrics. It’s pro-gobbledygook. Is this what passes for a song?

I just don’t get it. Maybe I’m too old. Rihanna is a beautiful girl with a gorgeous voice. Can’t she have decent songs? Also, Drake proves in his guest appearance that the sample he took of Timmy Thomas’s 1973 “Why Can’t We Live Together” for “Hotline Bling” was the biggest part of that record.

Meantime, Adele’s “Hello” finally got pushed out of the top 5 after eight or nine weeks. What a run, though!

Rihanna’s album, by the way, may or may not be a Samsung special for their mobile devices, or a chart record. Def Jam Records may feel that Adele is vulnerable to a take down now. If so, “Anti” had better have some actual songs.

Matthew Morrison Leaves “Finding Neverland” But the Show Has Plenty of “Glee” to Spare

0

I wondered what was going on with “Finding Neverland” at the Lunt Fontanne. Last night I stopped in to see Broadway star Tony Yazbeck take over for “Glee” star Matthew Morrison in the lead role of J.M. Barrie. Plus, Kelsey Grammer has recently returned after several months away. So, what’s up?

Morrison did his time–a year– and earned his Broadway stripes. He had a huge following from “Glee.” Would his absence hurt the show? Yazbeck had a Tony nomination and several others for “On the Town” last year. He’s a real Broadway vet and not that old. He looks like he could be the star of “Chicago PD.” But he can sing and dance.

And boy can he sing and dance. Last night was his first “Neverland” in front of an audience. And guess who was there? Producer Harvey Weinstein, who didn’t tell anyone he was coming. Plus composer Gary Barlow was watching. Just as I guessed, Yazbeck stepped in as if he’d always been there. A smoother transition would be hard to recall. He’s just got “it,” that Broadway thing, like Andy Karl and Steve Kazee and a few other Broadway leading men who are more and more a rarity. What a pleasure. Numbers like “Circus of Your Mind” and “The Dinner Party” really had more zip than I remembered.

“Neverland” was not a hit with the critics, was snubbed by the Tony Awards, and shunted aside. But a year later, the show has warmed up nicely. I was surprised how much I liked it. Kelsey Grammer, Carolee Carmello, Laura Michael Kelly and Teal Wicks lead cast still working hard but making it look easy. It’s a family show– there were lots of kids in the audience, and a lot on stage. The latter group is precocious and winning without being cloying.

The songs have settled in, too, especially “When Your Feet Don’t Touch the Ground.” Barlow is not pretending to be Sondheim. He writes hits. The “Neverland” songs are on a par with “Matilda” or “Kinky Boots.” You find yourself whistling more of them than you’d guess.

Carolee Carmello leaves soon for “Tuck Everlasting” so I advise you to get over to the Lunt-Fontanne fast. She is really wonderful. I don’t know how long everyone else is staying. But Kelsey Grammer seems more invested than ever in the show– he really is perfectly officious as Barrie’s producer, Charles Frohman. Both Laura Michelle Kelly and Teal Wicks sing like birds.

But my money is on Tony Yazbeck. Give him a month to settle in if you want. Or see him right now. Morrison came in with a lot of fanfare, which is great, and he did a sensational job. Second timers, I think, will be very interested in Yazbeck’s take on the man who wrote “Peter Pan.” A new cult may develop in short order.

“X Files” Returns with Huge Ratings, These 6 Episodes Won’t Be The End

0

“The X Files” came back on Sunday night at 10:30pm Eastern– after a long night of football. Were you still awake? A lot of people were, apparently. Like 16 million. And 6.1 percent of them were between the ages of 18 and 49. Sunday night’s delayed premiere of a six episode arc scored more viewers than anything except foot ball on Sunday night.

Last night the 2nd episode had a strong 9.7 million viewers and scored a 3.0 in the key demo. Those numbers may change as a lot of people may not have realized the second ep was the next night. Look for delayed viewing to increase the totals.

So the truth is out there, still. And we still have almost no info on the Mulder-Scully child, referred to coyly. Or Mulder’s missing years as a sex addicted screenwriter in California. My guess is we’re going to get more “X Files” sooner rather than later. But this new six-at-a-time mini run may be the way to go. Makes it special.

Sundance Record Set as “The Birth of a Nation” Sells to Fox Searchlight for $17.5 Mil

0

When the dust — or mud– settled in Sundance today, a new sales record was set. Fox Searchlight has reportedly bought “The Birth of a Nation” for $17.5 million.

The movie tells the story of former slave Nat Turner, who led a liberation of slaves that turned violent in 1831. Nate Parker wrote, directed and stars in the film as Turner.

A fierce bidding war went on all night in Sundance with The Weinstein Company, Paramount and Netflix all vying for the rights.

But Fox Searchlight won the Oscar for “12 Years a Slave,” so this makes sense. “The Birth of a Nation” will be a big player in next year’s Oscars and at the box office next fall.

Jimmy Fallon Donates $10K to WaterforFlint, Asks 10 Friends to Join Him and Gets…

0

Jimmy Fallon is on a roll. On Sunday he Tweeted that he was sending $10,000 to Flint, Michigan for bottled water. He asked 10 friends to join him.

Jimmy’s not the first celebrity to send water to Flint. Cher partnered up with Icelandic Glacial water for a 180,000 bottle donation. The water is already being delivered.

So far, Jimmy’s been joined in his efforts by Madonna, Rosie O’Donnell, Seth Meyers, and Jon Cryer. They’ve all chimed in on Twitter promising their own $10K. (Actually, Madonna– who was born near Flint– could send a million bucks, but all donations are welcome.)

So now let’s see who joins the group. People are dying in Flint, Michigan from poisoned water.

 

Oscars: Motion Picture Academy Answers Questions on New Rules, Reassures That Everyone Still Gets Screeners

0

AMPAS answers questions about the new rules at the Academy. It’s funny– I think a lot of people worried they wouldn’t get free screeners if they were ineligible to vote. So, be assured, everyone still gets screeners. Whew! Cheryl Boone Isaacs is trying to drag this group into the 21st century. Let’s help her. Membership must change for the films to reflect society– not just Beverly Hills.

 

Why is the Academy excluding older members from voting?

We’re not excluding older members. Everyone will retain membership.
But won’t older members lose their opportunity to vote for the Oscars?

These rules are not about age.  In fact, under the new rules many veteran Academy members will retain voting privileges.
I thought you had to work in the last ten years in order to vote.

Working in the last ten years is one way to ensure you have voting privileges. Another way is to have been nominated for an Oscar. And a third way is to show that since you were admitted as a member you’ve worked in motion pictures during three ten-year periods. This means that the longer your career, the more likely you’ll qualify for voting.
So we have to have worked for thirty years to keep the vote?

No. Let’s say you were admitted to the Academy in 1980 and you worked on one film in 1989. That covers you for your first ten years. Then you worked once in the ’90s, which covers you for your second ten-year term, and once again in 2001 for your third ten-year term. That’s only a twelve-year period, but you have worked in the three ten-year terms of your membership, so you’d qualify as an active member with voting status.
Do these ten-year terms have to be consecutive?

No, they do not.
How do you define “active in motion pictures?”

You must be employed in the same kinds of quality films that got you into the Academy in the first place. Your status will be assessed by your peers in your branch—the people who best understand the intricacies of the motion picture industry and your field. The intention is to be inclusive.
What about some of us—such as writers and producers—who work steadily but without screen credit?

Employment is employment, regardless of whether or not there is a screen credit. Additionally, members will have an opportunity to appeal their situation.
What if the work I’ve done is not in my branch?

If an editor becomes a director, or a director becomes a producer, or an actor sells a screenplay, that’s all employment in the movie industry, and it still qualifies.
What happens if I don’t qualify?

You move to emeritus status, which means you have all the benefits of membership except voting. You continue to receive screeners and you are still invited to Academy membership screenings and programs, but you no longer pay dues.
And what happens if I become active again after having been moved to emeritus status?

Upon review of your request, you can be reinstated as an active member with voting rights.
If I’m moved to emeritus status, does that mean I’ll no longer get screeners?

You are still eligible to receive screeners. The Academy does not distribute screeners. Production companies and studios do. We will ask our members who run these companies not to make an issue of it.  Rest assured, your status—whether active or emeritus—will not be shared with any other outside entity.
So why make these changes at all?

We want the Oscars to be voted on by people who are currently working in motion pictures, or who have been active for a long time. There are a number of Academy members, however, who had brief careers and left the business. We want to strengthen, uphold, and maintain the credibility of the Oscars with these new criteria.

Voting for the Oscars is a privilege of membership, not a right.
What about all the other changes you announced?

The other changes are aimed at increasing diversity in our membership and governance.

Under our bylaws, the board is required to continuously review our criteria for voting status and membership. This has happened in the past and this is one of those times.  Diversity has been an ongoing discussion for many years.
What about the changes on the board?

We’ve created three new governor seats, to be nominated by the president, and voted on by the board. These three seats will be filled by women and people of color, and the changes will take place in February.
What is the plan for new recruitment?

We will be actively recruiting new members.  We’re also adding non-governor seats to the six board committees that oversee all Academy activity. And we’re reforming the executive committees by which each branch conducts its business; these are the committees that decide whom to invite for membership.

We will maintain high standards and continue to admit only those with substantial achievements.  The concern has been that a lot of highly qualified potential members were falling outside our radar. Many thought they had to wait to be invited, and didn’t know they could apply for membership, through a sponsorship process.
But why lower standards to get new members?

We are not lowering any standards, we’re widening our net.

All of these are substantive changes that will open up our governance to a wider range of members and have a significant and positive impact on the Academy. The result will be a membership that is more inclusive of the motion picture community, governance that is more representative of our membership, and a stronger Academy overall.